Sunday, 22 March 2015

ATTACKS ON DOCTORS: SAVIOURS NEED TO BE DEFENDED


No physician, however conscientious or careful, can tell what day or hour he may be the object of some undeserved attack, malicious accusation, blackmail or a lawsuit for damages. It’s happening more and more- doctors being assaulted by patients or their relatives. A hospital is supposed to be a sanctuary, a place where people come for care at the most troubling times, where we seek safety and reassurance. Those needing such care greatly depend on the doctor and his support staff. Doctors strive to be impartial caregivers for everybody, to be the shining examples of humanitarian service and self-sacrifice. Doctors have traditionally enjoyed an unassailable halo, a mixture of healer, advisor and confessor. Doctors have been appropriately bestowed with a higher degree of trust than most members of society. These senseless acts of vandalism serve as a metaphor for the potential decay of a profession.

Today’s health care system is being transformed into a chaotic one because people tend to view the system as too expensive, dysfunctional, and at times, irrational. The regulatory and financial burdens placed on doctors can result in long wait times and short “face times” with patients. The high expectations raised by the latest medical technology can be shattered in individual cases.  Frustrations can reach the boiling point for some people, and the doctors or their clinics offices are not immune to them.

A doctor is often an object of strong feelings, both positive and negative. A patient may view him as a saviour, God or a magician.  Yet to some, he may be the symbol of a system gone wrong, if not the tool of one’s particular suffering. Violence stems from the complex dynamics of a given individual’s specific situation. Violence can be a flash reaction to frustrating helplessness, fear or humiliation. A doctor’s unique role may make him an iconic, visible scapegoat for health care’s failings, particularly now as his stature is being eroded by a combination of external forces and some of his own making.

The traditionally autonomous doctors, once independent operators of medical service, are becoming line workers in large systems. Majority of freshly passed ones choose employment, as opposed to private practice, given the daunting regulations and financial pressures. Though valued and trained members of the health care team, in many cases these doctors lack the privileges of performing high skill procedures, thus limiting their competence.

Additionally, the internet has turned everyone into a doctor.  Patients come to doctors armed with downloaded material targeting their condition, challenging the value of the doctor’s knowledge.  Lawyers also tend to do so regularly, to find a loophole in the procedure performed by the doctor so as to nail them, even if it was an exception made by the doctor, seeing the patient’s condition.

This devaluation of the profession of medicine is of some societal concern. Physicians are professionals not simply because they get paid.  Sociology, the social science that studies human interactions, organization, and institutions, defines a profession as an occupation which regulates itself through systematic, required training, and collegial discipline. A profession’s validated knowledge and competence is continually validated by the community of peers, and its continuing education standards. Perhaps most importantly, that professional knowledge results in judgment, advice, and actions oriented towards a set of substantive societal values, which is health and well-being in the case of medicine.  Service rather than profit is enshrined in its code of ethics.

Hence the profession is cognitive, collegial, and moral.  Because of this process of legitimization, doctors achieve a coveted status of professional authority, which is a valuable asset.  It increases the probability that people will obey a legitimate command or call to action and that a particular definition of reality and judgment of meaning and value will prevail as valid and true.  For example, a person heeds a doctor’s warnings about smoking, taking needed medication, vaccinations for personal and societal benefit.  A doctor’s authority also creates a dependency condition. Patients acknowledge the professional’s superior competence within a deep context of emotional and physical needs in the doctor-patient relationship. A component of this dependency condition actually promotes therapeutic success.  Therefore, professional authority is worth preserving and nurturing.

When a doctor abuses his professional authority, he contributes to the profession’s devaluation.  Medical education is expensive, with the doctors training for years, sacrificing early paychecks, and missing family time to attain and maintain the ideals of their calling.  A false sense of entitlement in some is understandable. Some may define themselves as professional simply as being paid for their service, and define professional success in financial terms. Clearly, the transformation of health care poses challenges for most doctors, and threatens to commercialize their specialized core assets.   Sensing an increasing loss of control, a growing frustration with their redefined industrialized role, it is easy for doctors striving to maintain the true ideals of their profession to become disillusioned, if not downright cynical. Cynicism can corrode all human values and can also corrode the values of a profession.

One cannot prevent precious loss of life of a patient in all the situations, and no doctor actually wants to do harm to his patient, or bring himself disrepute. Doctors, as well as policy makers and patients, should strive to sensibly prevent a noble profession’s pernicious loss of its cognitive, collegial and moral value system, a thing that is precious to one and all.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Translate